When you send enough MARC brochures, patterns start to emerge. Individual engagement sessions are interesting, but the real insights come from looking across thousands of views and asking, "What do buyers actually do when they receive a MARC?"
By analyzing a large sample of campaigns across multiple industries, a few clear behaviors show up again and again. They reveal how buyers prefer to consume content, how buying committees form, and what separates casual curiosity from real intent. In this article, we'll walk through the most important lessons from more than 10,000 MARC views - and what you can do with them.
One of the clearest patterns in MARC analytics is the role of replays. Prospects who ultimately book meetings and move into opportunities almost never stop at a single view. In the 10,000-view dataset we examined, high-value accounts were far more likely to:
On the other hand, campaigns that produced a lot of one-and-done views tended to underperform on downstream pipeline. The takeaway: a replay is more than a vanity metric - it's a strong signal that someone is actively thinking through your offer.
When you look at view duration data across thousands of sessions, you see curves - where people lean in and where they drop off. In well-performing brochures, the curve usually shows:
In weaker executions, the curve collapses early. Viewers drop off quickly when:
Across thousands of views, the pattern is consistent: campaigns that get quickly to a compelling "why" and then move into concrete proof keep people longer, and those extra seconds correlate with higher response rates.
Multi-viewer engagement is one of the most distinctive signals in MARC analytics. It shows up when a brochure is opened in different contexts or at different times in ways that look less like one person browsing and more like a series of group interactions.
In the dataset we studied, a meaningful percentage of opportunities - especially in B2B, financial services, and complex consumer purchases - showed clear multi-viewer behavior. When that happened, win rates went up, and average deal sizes were higher.
It's one thing to know that a decision is made by a group. It's another to see that group actively engaging with the same story in a coordinated way. MARC gives you that visibility.
Timing matters. When we examined the time windows between MARC engagement spikes and key outcomes (like demo requests or meetings), we saw a pattern: the days immediately following a cluster of engagements were significantly more likely to produce positive responses.
In other words, when a prospect or buying team is passing the brochure around and watching it multiple times within a short span, that's your moment. Teams that aligned their outreach with these windows saw much better connection rates and more productive conversations.
Different industries and roles behaved differently with MARC, but there were still recognizable 'high-intent personas' in the data. For example:
Once you see these patterns, you can create content that speaks directly to the behaviors that show up in your best opportunities - and build lookalike audiences based on the segments that engage most deeply.
The best way to make these insights real is to look at your own data. MARC's analytics dashboard lets you see view curves, replays, multi-day engagement, and committee behavior across every campaign.
Walk Through a Live Analytics Dashboard
Or, if you want a structured way to interpret your data, start with the engagement score framework.
Download the Engagement Score Framework